RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT

 

Understanding Risk Management Strategies in Project Management

 

Table of Contents

Positive Risk Management Strategies

Negative Risk Management Strategies

Contingent Risk Response Strategies

 

Risks can be considered to be an opportunity, i.e., a risk that could have a negative effect on the project's objectives or an opportunity, i.e., a risk that has positive effects on project goals, and consequently, there are a variety of ways to manage both positive and negative risks in the context of managing projects. As risk avoidance in project management is the key.

 

How do project managers identify risk?

The process of identifying risk during project management involves imagining all the things that could be right (negative risks to the project) and things that might go right (positive risks), similar to reactive and proactive risk strategies. As a guideline, consider your project's goals.

Positive risks can lead to profitable opportunities However, only if the team working on the project prepares in a manner that is appropriate. For instance, finishing the project earlier than planned could result in more sales, but If sales teams aren't equipped for sales, or the production teams aren't able to meet the demands, the opportunity may be missed. (Or even more damaging: your business's image and earnings could be damaged.)

Negative risks could have dire consequences. For instance delays in the development of a product could cause sales teams to have nothing to offer, and an error in the design of the product could result in expensive recalls or litigation. To prevent these unpleasant results, it's essential to be sure to include management and risk reduction strategies in your plan of action.

 

Types of Risk Management Strategies

 

Positive Risk Management Strategies

 

Now let's take a look at different types of risk management strategies that are helpful in project management.

 

Exploit

Exploitation is a way of creating a positive/proactive risk management can lead to an opportunity. As a manager of a project, you have allocated the right resources to make the most of this chance. This reduces the uncertainty that comes with an opportunity to take a positive risk, by ensuring that it occurs.

 

Share

If the team working on the project isn’t able to take advantage of the chance, they could seek out a second business to collaborate with. The experience and expertise of a different company can be leveraged to increase the benefit of the opportunity. Strategic risk examples of sharing opportunities include team-building, risk-sharing partnerships and companies with unique purposes as well as joint ventures. The parties involved gain according to their actions and investment.

 

Enhance

Enhancing means increasing the chance of the risk happening and increasing the impact. This is achieved by identifying and changing the different risk triggers. A good, risk management strategy example of how to increase an opportunity is adding resources to the project to complete the project earlier.

 

Accept

It is about making the most of the risk that is positive when it occurs, but not actively seeking it. It's the same as having an opportunity presenting itself and then being accepted without much planning.

 

Negative Risk Management Strategies

 

Avoid

Avoidance reduces risk by eliminating the reason. It could lead to either not performing the activity or performing the task in a different manner. The project manager might modify or eliminate the goal that is in danger. Certain risks can be avoided by an early collection of data and better communication between the stakeholders or using the expertise of others.

An example of this is an extension of the schedule or a change in the schedule The scope of the activity. Another instance could be the risk that is so risky to be a danger that could result in death and can be avoided by closing the project completely.

The concept of risk avoidance refers to a particular kind of strategy for managing risk. It requires the use of a systematic procedure. The leaders must be aware of and evaluate the risks they face in their organizations and figure out the best way to reduce the chance of damaging the company.

Since that risk avoidance can be a calculated strategy and different from not being able to recognize risks or completely ignoring them.

What is the role of risk avoidance in a risk management strategy?

Management of risks is an organizational practice that starts with the three steps listed below:

Recognize threats to the business in general as well as its capital assets, assets as well as earnings, and revenue.

Determine the likelihood of these dangers negatively impacting the company.

Estimate the damage which could result from the risk of a potential catastrophe -for instance, i.e. estimate the risk exposure.

The risk for organizations is varied some risk factors could cause massive, extensive damage to an organization; however, others can cause minor harm.

 

Transfer

In the Risk Transfer approach, the risk is transferred to a third party. The third party, which is an insurance company or vendor is paid to assume or take care of risks on behalf of you. And consequently, the ownership, as well as the consequences of the risk, are carried by the third party. The payment is known as the risk premium. For instance, a person who purchases insurance for their car will be obtaining financial protection from bodily injury or physical injury that could result from traffic accidents.

Contracts are concluded to transfer the responsibility of risk to a third party.
Risk Transfer cannot reduce danger; it does reduce the direct impact of risks on the projects. The tools used to transfer risk are a few, including an insurance policy or warranties, performance bonds, and guarantees, among others. This method is the most efficient in securing risks to the financial sector.

The concept of risk transfer can be described as a typical method of managing risk where the risk of losing money due to an unfortunate outcome facing an individual or an entity is transferred to an unrelated third entity. To pay this third party for taking on the risk, the person or organization will usually make the third party regular payments.

 

Mitigate

It reduces the chance of the occurrence of a risk or reduces the effect on the risks within the acceptable boundaries. Risk mitigation strategies in project management strategy rely on the basic concept that earlier the measure taken to lessen the likelihood or effect of a risk is more effective than fixing to fix the damage after the risk is triggered.
A way to reduce risk is to employ modern technology or the most effective practices to create more free of defects, through risk treatment strategies.

The mitigation process may need a prototype design to assess the risk degree. If it isn't possible to lower the risk, the risk, impact reduction can be achieved by finding the links that determine the risk's severity.

 

Risk Mitigation Techniques

 

Risk reduction requires project managers to evaluate risks by following a sequence of steps.

Find out if there are risks that could be present. Find out the likelihood of each risk's occurrence and the potential harm that should happen (risk assessment). Decide how to handle every risk that occurs (risk response or treatment); and Prioritize risk areas (high impact medium impact, moderate impact, or low impact) to ensure you address the most pressing issues first.

Risk control strategies are applied to vary risk from preparing funds for contingency in the event that the project's costs rise (a typical risk project managers must face) and having backup suppliers to purchase the items or services that your project may require.

Planning for risk mitigation is essential prior to when the event of a crisis occurs So, make sure you ask your team members for suggestions about how to mitigate the burden of any identified risks. These include new risks, risks that you are aware of as well as risks you aren't aware of.

 

Techniques for handling risk mitigation are:

Accept or Assume: Acknowledge the existence of specific risk and make a decision to accept the risk without putting in any effort to manage it. The approval of the project or program leaders is essential.

Do not: Adjust program requirements or limitations to minimize or eliminate risk. This can be accomplished through a change in the schedule, funding or technical specifications.

Management: Implement actions to reduce the risk or the potential of the danger.

Transfer: Transfer organizational accountability and responsibility to a stakeholder willing to take on the risk.

Monitor/Watch: Check the surrounding environment to detect changes that impact the nature or the effect of the threat

 

Accept

Acceptance implies accepting the strategic risk, particularly when no other strategy is in place to reduce the risk. Acceptance could be passive acceptance as well as active acceptance.

Passive acceptance does not require any other procedure other than documenting the risk and then leaving the team to handle the risk as they arise. With an active acceptance method, a contingency reserve is created to cover the loss of time or money or other resources.

Risk acceptance isn't really an effective method of reducing risk since the acceptance of a risk doesn't decrease its impact. But, it is an option that can be considered in strategic risk assessment.

 There are many reasons companies might opt for risk acceptance in certain circumstances. 

The most frequent motive is because the costs of other financial risk management strategies like the ability to avoid or limit risk, might surpass the expense of the risk in itself. There's no point investing $100,000 to prevent the risk of $10,000. When the expense is greater than the reward, the majority of businesses choose to accept the risk instead of spending time or money to mitigate it.

The concept of taking a risk can be called “the "do nothing" alternative. It's a common notion for those familiar with the basics of project management.

When you design your plans be sure to consider the consequences that come with "doing absolutely nothing." This is an effective way to ensure that you're taking correct actions, since if you think about the implications of taking the risk mitigation strategies; you'll identify the potential negative consequences and weigh them against other alternatives.

 

Contingent Risk Response Strategies

These strategies are in effect only in the event of certain events. The implementation of these strategies is only possible in certain predefined circumstances. The team is waiting for the right warning signals prior to the implementation of the strategies. These warning signals might not include the milestones or work items, deadlines, etc.

These strategies can include the use of staffing reallocations, financial reserves and working around to limit the loss. fix the damage as much as feasible and avoid a repeat.

 

Software Tools for Management of Project Risks

 

Managing risks and remaining within the guidelines of industry standards and regulations could be just as significant a problem in managing risk for projects as it is incorporate risk management. In both instances, using effective governance of risk, compliance, and governance (GRC) solutions can make managing risk simpler. Monitors your network and systems to discover weaknesses in your security that can make your company or project more vulnerable to threats and display these on friendly colored dashboards that inform you at a glance what your weaknesses are and what you can do to address these.